Why We Gave Metal Gear Solid V a 10 (No Spoilers) – The Lobby

We ask Peter Brown your questions about his 10/10 review of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain. Don’t worry, we kept it spoiler free!

Read Peter’s in-depth review at!

Catch The Lobby LIVE…

Related Articles


  1. So you're saying that if Kojima had actually been allowed to finish the game (mission 51) then it would not have been any better, because it's 10/10 anyway? Fucking facepalm.
    This right here is why nobody gives a shit about the "professional media press" anymore #gamergate

  2. Ok, according to you, this game has no cons…. only benefits, right? 10 / 10? An incomplete game, with a terrible history, repetitive and without any coherency comparing to others MGS?
    Come on, just confess…. who did pay you to say and publish all this bullshit?

  3. I am 100% certain that some of the reviews on Gamespot are payed reviews because there is absolutely no way that a game that repeats the missions, yes REPEATS THE SAME MISSIONS in the second chapter, has a terrible story mixed up and damaged hugely by the exact same missions from the chapter one, mark my words, exactly, a product which is obviously half finished gets a 10.
    Unbelievable, this is the first game I have ever played where literally the game repeats itself with no logic, no story, no nothing with an obvious unfinished design.Fucking disgusting.

  4. It’s a great game. And after putting 15 hours into I realized it is not a 10. It is more an 8. My reasoning
    1.) it’s gets extremely repetitive
    2.) It’s quite tedious collecting everything which like soldiers and resources which is basically needed to progress

Back to top button